• Login
    View Item 
    •   UZ eScholar Home
    • Library
    • Special Collections
    • Working Papers
    • View Item
    •   UZ eScholar Home
    • Library
    • Special Collections
    • Working Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The policy analysis matrix in Zimbabwe: A methodological introduction

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Masters_The_policy_analysis_matrix_in_Zimbabwe.pdf (2.102Mb)
    Date
    1989-07
    Author
    Masters, William A.
    Type
    Working Paper
    Metadata
    Show full item record

    Abstract
    This paper discusses the methodology behind the policy analysis matrix (PAM), an approach to the study- of incentives and incomes in alternative production activities. The PAM method uses average-cost budgets to list the costs and benefits of each activity, initially at market prices in terms of private income,. and then at opportunity cost in terms of national income. The . market-price budget shows the private profitability of the activity, while the opportunity-cost-budget shows its contribution to the economy as a whole, indicating the degree of ;economic efficiency and comparative advantage enjoyed by the activity. Such datai are needed for project appraisals, and for guiding'public-sector investments towards more productive To complete the PAM, the opportunity-cost budget is subtracted from the budget at market prices, revealing a third budget of "divergences," or income transfers between that.activity and others in the national economy. Such transfers could be caused by government policies,' market failures, or both. In either . case, they represent gains ("rents") or losses ("implicit taxes") which are not justified by'the activity's contribution to - national income. Transfers may be justified by other concerns, such as income distribution or food security, but all, too often they serve no such purpose and actually conflict with government • objectives. By revealing these hidden transfers, showing who : gains and who loses from current policies and market structures, the PAM assists in the formulation of more appropriate ’future price policies and market regulations. The matrix approach works by linking widely-available , microeconomic, sectoral, and macroeconomic data'in a simple, consistent framework, to provide static, partial-equilibrium , indicators of the current situation. Such an approach i-s useful primarily wher^ the historical or cross sectional data and complex modeling tools needed for more sophisticated approaches are unavailable. This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of the PAM method in the Zimbabwean context., and discusses bow 'additional information about resource availabilities,, ' , - elasticities of supply and demand, likely changes in technology or , prices over time, differential risk factors, and the crossprice or general equilibrium effects of changing resource . . allocations could be used to extend the analysis, beyond the ; limitations of the indicator approach.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10646/3305
    Additional Citation Information
    Masters, W. A. (1989). The policy analysis matrix in Zimbabwe: An methodological introduction (Working paper AEE, 6/89). Harare: University of Zimbabwe, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension.
    Publisher
    University of Zimbabwe, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension
    Subject
    Food production
    Crop budgeting
    Collections
    • Working Papers [68]

    University of Zimbabwe: Educating To Change Lives!
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2020  DuraSpace | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of UZ eScholarCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage StatisticsView Google Analytics Statistics

    University of Zimbabwe: Educating To Change Lives!
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2020  DuraSpace | Contact Us | Send Feedback